Stimulation for voiding dysfunction

Read about the latest Technology, which Doctors are performing this technique and the advantages and disadvantages of this cutting edge pain management therapy.

Stimulation for voiding dysfunction

Postby Amanda » Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:06 pm

Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):19-28. Links
Sacral nerve stimulation for voiding dysfunction: One institution's 11-year experience.Sutherland SE, Lavers A, Carlson A, Holtz C, Kesha J, Siegel SW.
Metro Urology, Center for Continence Care and Female Urology, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to review our institution's 11-year experience with SNS for the treatment of refractory voiding dysfunction. Dating back to 1993, it covers a span of time which describes the evolution of SNS as it includes PNE trials, non-tined (bone-anchored or fascial-anchored) leads, percutaneous tined leads with two-staged procedures, and even percutaneous pudendal trials. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on SNS patients who received an implantable pulse generator (IPG) in our practice from 12/1993 to 12/2004. After Institutional Review Board approval, consents for chart review were obtained from 104 patients, representing 44% of this neuromodulatory patient population. RESULTS: Of our population, 87% were female and 13% were male. Average age at implant was 50 years +/- 13.4 years. Duration of symptoms before implantation was 116 months (range 9-600 months). Eighty percent were implanted for a predominant complaint of urinary urgency and frequency (U/F). Overall, 22% had U/F only, 38% had concomitant urge incontinence (UI), and 20% had concomitant mixed incontinence (MI). Twenty percent were treated for non-obstructive urinary retention (UR), with half of these associated with a neurogenic etiology. Additionally, 46.2% had pelvic pain, 58.6% had bowel complaints, and 51% reported sexual dysfunction. In patients with U/F, mean voiding parameters as described by pre-implant voiding diaries revealed the following: 12.4 (+/-5.1) voids per 24 hr; 2.3 (+/-1.8 ) voids per night; 5.0 (+/-4.7) leaks per 24 hr; and 2.3 (+/-2.6) pads per 24 hr. Statistically significant improvements post-implantation were noted with mean decreases in the following: 4.3 voids per 24 hr; 1.0 void per night; 4.4 leaks per 24 hr; and 2.3 pads per 24 hr (all P < 0.05). In the UR group a statistically significant improvement post-implantation was noted only in voids per night, with a mean decrease of 0.8 (P <0>50%, >80%, and >90% in 69%, 50%, and 35% of patients, respectively. By quality of life survey, 60.5% of patients were satisfied and 16.1% were dissatisfied with current urinary symptoms. Only 13% (14 patients) abandoned therapy, making up a significant portion of those dissatisfied with current urinary symptoms. Good overall lead durability was seen (mean 22 months, range 1-121 months), with the first successful lead proving to be the most durable (mean 28 months, range 1.4-120 months). Lead durability decreased progressively with subsequent trials. Overall, 53% of patients experienced at least one reportable event (RE) attributable to either lead or IPG. A total of 126 REs were noted, with 97% mild-to-moderate in severity. REs included lack of efficacy, loss of efficacy, infection, hematoma/seroma, migration, pain, undesirable change in sensation, and device malfunction. In this population, 47.1% of leads were tined while 52.9% were non-tined. Tined leads had an overall lower RE rate as compared to non-tined leads: 28% and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SNS is an effective method for treating certain types of voiding dysfunction. Although 53% of patients experienced at least one RE, 97% were mild-to-moderate and did not appear to affect the continued use of this therapy. With improved technology, such as percutaneous tined leads, the RE rate is decreasing. Further analyses of subsets of this population are currently underway. Neurourol. Urodynam. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

PMID: 17078071 [PubMed - in process]
PNE started 2003 following Vaginal Hysterectomy, pelvic floor repair and right oophorectomy; eventually after many tests had BilateralTG surgery Nantes 2004; following this tried many other treatments including 7 day epidural, ketamin infusions to no avail; Trialed and was implanted with a Neurostimulator in 2007- Dr Van Buyten Belgium, this has enabled me to manage my pain much better.
User avatar
Amanda
 
Posts: 457
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:33 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Return to NEUROSTIMULATION

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron