Love that article jep

Especially the last line.
I have been to a few Tribunals now as my injury was assessed as an Industrial injury too as I fell at work. I did find that the one Tribunal I eventually got to for the ESA
was totally independent, they actually listened and were quite lovely tbh. I may have this impression because I did win

I can only say that they were fair and unbiased, unlike ATOS.
The whole set up is a deceit! There, I've said it

They ask questions like how far can you walk? 50 m 100 m 200 m but forget to add the all important bit 'without pain'.
We all know that pain can be subjective and isn't measurable (I really wish it could be) I believe they clarify this a little further by saying pain is not discomfort (say tingling or pins and needles) but neither does it have to be excruciating pain. The same for sitting etc of course. After 5 years of this it's only the excruciating pain that stops me if I am silly enough to get there (which I sometimes am if I am honest)
I would not assume that your Tribunal will be similar. It is up to YOU to provide all medical evidence (as you probably know) do not assume they will know anything or understand.Will you have representation? Stupidly I didn't (all times)
The Industrial Injury Tribunals have been a different story. I've been to 3; 2 were adjourned,(although also have had 4 cancelled too

) The last to be adjourned was in order to ask important questions of the Secretary of State. 'Does pudendal neuralgia and piriformis syndrome exist and can they be caused by trauma?' and 'who are experts in the UK?'. . .. if they do exist of course!!!
The last Tribunal wasn't as bad as the second adjourned one, where the dr on the Tribunal said that if he found that my medical reports stating I have pelvic nerve entrapments (from Dr Filler and Dr Greenslade) had been 'procured from the internet', these ('how do we know they are not') 'quacks' would be facing a lengthy jail sentence, meaning me of course too, as the procurer!!!! They hadn't heard of google?
I was on my own (as I said, stupid) and fell apart

I guess because the ESA Tribunal people had been so understanding I wasn't expecting such ridiculous resistance to a very real medical complaint. It was like a fascist medical police gone mad!
Anyway the answer came back from a Dr Leris (Leeds) for the Secretary of State that PN and PS do exist (Hooray it's official) and although she discovered that PN Can be caused by trauma piriformis syndrome can not. Dr L also identified Dr Greenslade as an expert

. I have a printed S of S letter from the Tribunal stating that PN does exist which may be helpful in your case?
So for my latest Industrial injuries Tribunal all I needed to do was show that Ps could also be caused by trauma (I fell on my bum) Easy!
But NO! None of that was mentioned and all of my carefully prepared info wasted as we started right from scratch, again. I faced a local Professor and a 'Mr', (as well as the judge) they had drafted in especially. The Prof just shook his head when I explained my multiple nerve entrapments at piriformis level, as diagnosed by Dr Greenslade (the medical expert identified by the S of S this specially requested info did me no good whatsoever)
This Tribunal did smile more ( at one time the Prof actually called me a 'good girl' for taking an interest in cognitive therapies for pain, how condescending . . . . apart from the fact that I'm 56!) but were just as biased and pelvic nerve entrapment 'deniers' through and through.
What can anyone do against such ignorance when titles alone herald them as 'expert'.
Sorry have deviated from topic . . . but it does make excellent pub conversation

, and unfortunately I don't go anymore.
I'm sure your representative will keep you right and more importantly 'them' right. If you need any of my stuff just ask, although all of the best papers on PN are on the home page here. The Guide to Chronic Pelvic Pain 2012 is Co authored by Dr Baranowski (London) and another pain consultant from Middlesbrough (Hughes?) the Tribunal tend to be very medically nationalistic

.
Helen