Karyn wrote:Welcome to HOPE, Dr. Attaman!
I have a couple of questions regarding statements you've made in the MRN thread:
"The best way to prove whether you have pudendal neuralgia is an image guided local anesthetic injection (block) of the pudendal nerve. If this gives you excellent pain relief for at least a few hours, the diagnosis is likely.
Therefore I generally only order MRI neurograms of the pudendal nerve if diagnostic blocks have rendered the diagnosis of pudendal neuralgia definitively, but my patient continues to have pain. In that case, I know that the problem is pudendal neuralgia, but I want to see if there is any specific area of entrapment or injury that may explain why pain persists".
Can you please explain how/why these injections are considered to be diagnostic? My unprofessional, simplistic thought process is that if you inject
any tissue in the body with an anesthetic, numbness or altered sensation is likely to occur.
The flip side to that is: I'm personally aware of many patients who've had "failed" nerve blocks, yet were indeed severely entrapped at the level of the SSL & STL. Zero pain relief, zero numbness. Not even a bit of tingling. Just a pain flare. In quite a few of these cases, the thought has been that due to profound scarring, the medication wasn't able to penetrate its target.
Secondly, what does your injection cocktail consist of? There seems to be a variation in medications with these blocks, depending on who administers them.
Thank you very much for reaching out to us, and for contributing to our community!
Kind regards,
Karyn
Dear Karyn,
Great questions.
It is true that if we injected a massive amount of local anesthetic into the
soft tissues along the entirety of the course of the pudendal nerve (in other words, injected many times all along the perianal, perineal, and genital regions), most pain associated typically associated with pudendal neuralgia would go away temporarily. This is otherwise known as topical anesthesia. This would require many tens of cc's and many injection sites. This is NOT what is done for diagnostic injections, pudendal or otherwise.
For diagnostic nerve blocks, the nerve is first located as accurately as possible using image and/or electrical guidance. Then a VERY small amount of local anesthetic is injected in this VERY discreet, very specific location. The medication is distributed over a portion of the nerve deep inside the body. Therefore, this temporarily interrupts the function of the nerve. If this results of alleviation of the typical pain (along the entire course of the nerve distribution), then we can conclude the nerve is indeed the pain generator.
This is similar to using a voltmeter on electrical wiring to identify faulty wires.
You can learn more about the different types of blocks on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_anesthetic
For those who do not attain even short term pain relief from image guided nerve blocks, the diagnosis of that nerve causing the pain is unlikely. In the case of the pudendal nerve, if it is blocked reasonably proximal to its origin, everything from that point distal should be relieved of pain, entrapped or not.
Nobody has determined the ideal injection cocktail for pudendal neuralgia. Typically I use a combination of a short acting (2-4% lidocaine) or long acting (0.5% or 0.75% marcaine, .5% ropivicaine) local anesthetic mixed with a steroid (kenalog or dexamethasone). I like to follow what is called a dual block paradigm, in which I block the nerve on two different days. I have my patient fill out a pain log after each injection. If I see a shorter duration of pain relief from the lidocaine injection, and a longer duration of pain relief from the marcaine injection, that helps to validate the study and rule out placebo effect.
The dual block paradigm is used in certain highly studied and validated spinal injections, and I have carried it over to blocks of the pudendal nerve.
There are always exceptions in medicine that do not follow the rules so keep that in mind.